Sedentary Work Exerting up to 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of force occasionally and/or a negligible amount of force frequently or constantly to lift, carry, push, pull, or otherwise move objects, including the human body. Sedentary work involves sitting most of the time, but may involve walking or standing for brief periods of time. Jobs are sedentary if walking and standing are required only occasionally and other sedentary criteria are met.

Light Work Exerting up to 20 pounds (9.1 kg) of force occasionally and/or up to 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of force frequently, and/or negligible amount of force constantly to move objects. Physical demand requirements are in excess of those for Sedentary Work. Light Work usually requires walking or standing to a significant degree. However, if the use of the arm and/or leg controls requires exertion of forces greater than that for Sedentary Work and the worker sits most the time, the job is rated Light Work.

Medium Work Exerting up to 50 (22.7 kg) pounds of force occasionally, and/or up to 25 pounds (11.3 kg) of force frequently, and/or up to 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of forces constantly to move objects.

Heavy Work Exerting up to 100 pounds (45.4 kg) of force occasionally, and/or up to 50 pounds (22.7 kg) of force frequently, and/or in excess of 20 pounds (9.1 kg) of force constantly to move objects.

Very Heavy Work Exerting in excess of 100 pounds (45.4 kg) of force occasionally, and/or in excess of 50 pounds (22.7 kg) of force frequently, and/or in excess of 20 pounds (9.1 kg) of force constantly to move objects.

Job Classification

In most duration tables, five job classifications are displayed. These job classifications are based on the amount of physical effort required to perform the work. The classifications correspond to the Strength Factor classifications described in the United States Department of Labor's Dictionary of Occupational Titles. The following definitions are quoted directly from that publication.

Sedentary Work Exerting up to 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of force occasionally and/or a negligible amount of force frequently or constantly to lift, carry, push, pull, or otherwise move objects, including the human body. Sedentary work involves sitting most of the time, but may involve walking or standing for brief periods of time. Jobs are sedentary if walking and standing are required only occasionally and other sedentary criteria are met.

Light Work Exerting up to 20 pounds (9.1 kg) of force occasionally and/or up to 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of force frequently, and/or negligible amount of force constantly to move objects. Physical demand requirements are in excess of those for Sedentary Work. Light Work usually requires walking or standing to a significant degree. However, if the use of the arm and/or leg controls requires exertion of forces greater than that for Sedentary Work and the worker sits most the time, the job is rated Light Work.

Medium Work Exerting up to 50 (22.7 kg) pounds of force occasionally, and/or up to 25 pounds (11.3 kg) of force frequently, and/or up to 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of forces constantly to move objects.

Heavy Work Exerting up to 100 pounds (45.4 kg) of force occasionally, and/or up to 50 pounds (22.7 kg) of force frequently, and/or in excess of 20 pounds (9.1 kg) of force constantly to move objects.

Very Heavy Work Exerting in excess of 100 pounds (45.4 kg) of force occasionally, and/or in excess of 50 pounds (22.7 kg) of force frequently, and/or in excess of 20 pounds (9.1 kg) of force constantly to move objects.

Displacement, Cervical Intervertebral Disc Without Myelopathy


Related Terms

  • Cervical Disc Herniation
  • Cervical Disc Prolapse
  • Cervical Disc Protrusion
  • Disc Herniation
  • Disc Protrusion
  • Disc Rupture
  • Herniated Disc
  • Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP)
  • Slipped Disc

Differential Diagnosis

Specialists

  • Neurologist
  • Neurosurgeon
  • Orthopedic (Orthopaedic) Surgeon
  • Physiatrist (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Specialist)
  • Physical Therapist
  • Psychiatrist

Comorbid Conditions

  • Curvature of the spine (scoliosis)
  • Depression
  • Low back pain
  • Mechanical instability
  • Obesity
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Rheumatologic disease (including rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis)
  • Spondylosis with or without facet joint arthritis

Factors Influencing Duration

Length of disability depends on the location and number of affected discs, and whether nerve root compression has resulted in cervical radiculopathy. Other factors include the severity of any neurological involvement, and whether these neurological deficits are improving, static, or worsening over time. The individual's age and whether surgery was performed are important factors influencing the duration of disability. Psychosocial factors, including the individual's attitude and willingness to return to work and to comply with a home exercise program contribute to the outcome. Dependence on pain medications can be an important factor influencing duration for some individuals, especially if the employer has a policy precluding use of controlled substances in those with safety sensitive jobs.

Medical Codes

ICD-9-CM:
722.0 - Cervical Intervertebral Disc Displacement without Myelopathy; Neuritis (Brachial) or Radiculitis Due to Displacement of Cervical Intervertebral Disc

Overview

© Reed Group
Displacement of a cervical intervertebral disc refers to protrusion or herniation of the disc between two adjacent bones (vertebrae) of the cervical spine in the neck (vertebrae C2 through C7). Note that there is no disc between the skull and C1 or between C1 and C2. Although displacement is commonly referred to as a slipped disc, the disc does not actually slip.

The discs between each vertebra form a cushion that absorbs shock and allows movement of the neck. The discs are composed of an inner gel-like material (nucleus pulposus) and an outer ring of tough, fibrous material (annulus fibrosis). Sometimes the fibrous material develops a weak area that allows the nucleus pulposus to intrude into the spinal canal (disc displacement or herniation). Depending on the site of the intrusion, the disc may compress either the spinal cord or the exiting nerves, or both. Pressure on an exiting cervical nerve root where it exits the spinal canal can cause changes in sensory (touch, pinprick, temperature), motor (muscle strength), and reflex function in the innervated areas (upper limb). These types of changes are collectively referred to as radiculopathy; however, disc displacement may also occur without radiculopathy. Cervical radiculopathy also may be caused by tumors, infection, or vertebral fracture. Disruption of the annulus fibrosis itself may also cause symptoms (annular disruption, distension, or tear). This can allow the nucleus pulposus to leak out of the disc, causing an intense and painful chemical inflammation (radiculitis).

Disc herniations (commonly called "soft discs" in the neck) tend to occur in younger adults who have only mild loss of disc height (disc degeneration) and thus have enough disc material still present to produce a protrusion or herniation. The same radiculopathy symptoms and signs on exam can be produced without a disc herniation in older individuals who no longer have enough disc height (disc material) to produce a herniation, but rather have arthritic spurs (osteophytes) as the structure that pinches the nerve root. In these older individuals the term used to indicate the cause of the radiculopathy is "hard disc," meaning bone spur or "bony bar."

The most common sites of disc displacement are between the fifth and sixth (C5-C6) or the sixth and seventh (C6-C7) cervical vertebrae. These two levels have the most movement, thought to be a contributing factor. Cervical intervertebral disc displacement usually occurs as a result of age-related physiological changes leading to progressive degeneration of the cervical spine; it is rarely the result of a single traumatic injury. Age-related changes may begin as early as the second decade in life. Disc degeneration can result in looseness (hypermobility) of the affected vertebral segment, leading to instability of the cervical spine, osteoarthritis, or both. Individuals with degenerative cervical disc disease are frequently genetically predisposed to develop lumbar disc disease. Degenerative disc disease can result in spinal cord compression (myelopathy), but this is uncommon.

Incidence and Prevalence: About 8% of all herniated discs occur in the cervical region of the spine ("Herniated Nucleus Pulposus"). Among pain-free (asymptomatic) individuals, herniated cervical discs are observed by MRI in 10% of adults younger than 40 years and in 5% of those older than 40. Displaced cervical discs occur as often in men as in women (Furman).

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Causation and Known Risk Factors

There are no prospective cohort studies to assess causation of cervical disc herniation. There are case-control studies that pose the question of whether smoking, heavy lifting, and being a professional driver increase the risk of developing a cervical disc herniation.

The largest case control study was designed to determine the incidence of cervical radiculopathy and associated risk factors (Schoenfeld). The US military population at risk in this study was 13,813,333. This study looked at incidence rate ratios and found that females were at a greater risk of cervical radiculopathy than males (IRR 1.36; 95% CI 1.30-1.42). White individuals in the military had a greater risk of radiculopathy than black American service-members (IRR 1.61; 95% CI 1.54-1.68). Junior enlisted individuals would have the most physically demanding jobs, yet they had the lowest rate of cervical radiculopathy. Compared to the junior enlisted people, senior enlisted individuals had a higher incidence (5.48; 95% CI 4.44-6.77). The jobs of officers are typically less physically demanding than the jobs of enlisted personnel, yet junior officers IRR was 3.00 (95% CI 2.23-4.04), and senior officers IRR was 7.23 (95% CI 5.55-9.42), indicating that age, not physical activity, is the main risk factor. Age was identified by the authors as potentially the greatest risk factor, with statistically significant increases in adjusted IRR among successive age groups, and this was consistent with other epidemiological studies that examined the incidence and prevalence of cervical radiculopathy (Schoenfeld).

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Diagnosis

History: Important items to note in the history include: information about pain (onset, location, quantity, quality, setting, aggravating and alleviating factors, associated symptoms), percentage of pain that is axial (neck) vs. peripheral (upper limb) pain, and history of neck injury. Disc-related pain without nerve root involvement may be vague and diffuse. Radicular pain from nerve root compression typically follows a dermatomal pattern in upper limb; neck pain may be paradoxically absent. The pain may have begun with no apparent cause, or there may be a history of injury to the neck. Some episodes begin during or shortly after the person does a “low violence” activity that the individual has done many times before, and this “minor trauma” may be blamed for the event by both health care providers and patients. The location of the pain, sensory loss, and muscle weakness in the limb usually allow the physician to determine which nerve root is most likely to be compressed by a disc herniation.

These individuals sometimes rest the symptomatic upper extremity on the top of their head to decrease pain. Coughing or sneezing makes the pain worse, and affected individuals may report that they are more comfortable sleeping in a reclining chair than in a bed. If treatment is not sought, individuals may notice increasing weakness in the affected limb. A history of prior or existing systemic illness should be obtained, including chronic disease (e.g., diabetes, heart disease, atherosclerosis, nervous system disorders, arthritis, infections, malignancies, or weight loss).

Physical exam: Cervical intervertebral disc displacement usually limits range of motion of the neck. The exam may show that neck movement aggravates pain, particularly when bending the head backward (hyperextension) and turning the head from side to side (rotation). The manual application of cervical compression and distraction during the physical exam may help to differentiate between disc pain and pain from other causes. Pain may increase when downward pressure is applied to the top of the head (cervical compression test) and may be relieved by traction (cervical distraction test). Examination should include assessment of muscle strength and changes in sensation and reflexes in the upper extremities. Lower extremities may be examined to rule out signs of myelopathy.

Tests: Laboratory blood tests are usually not necessary, but may include erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to evaluate inflammation, white blood count analysis to rule out infection, rheumatoid factor, thyroid and parathyroid studies, and liver function studies. Human leukocyte antigens may be typed. Results of these tests help rule out other conditions.

Imaging studies show the extent of degenerative changes, but do not give any information about function. Plain x-rays show narrowing of the disc space and bone spur (osteophyte) formation, if present, as well as possible metastatic disease, spinal deformity, and spine stability. If mechanical instability is suspected as a cause of recurrent pain, it can be documented by x-rays taken with the neck bent forward (flexion) and bent backward (hyperextension).

MRI or myelography combined with CT are considered the best ways to diagnose a herniated cervical disc. Electromyography (EMG) may distinguish nerve root compression from a peripheral nerve problem such as carpal tunnel syndrome or ulnar nerve entrapment. Nevertheless, a normal EMG does not rule out nerve root compression. As in the lumbar spine, asymptomatic herniations are frequently seen in normal volunteers. For this reason, disc herniations on imaging studies must correlate with the clinical signs of nerve root deficit observed on physical examination.

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Treatment

Conservative therapy is the first line of treatment except in cases of severe or progressive neurologic compression that is usually in a specific area of skin supplied by a specific spinal nerve (dermatome) and can be matched to an MRI with disc protrusion at the same level. Bed rest is rarely indicated. Intermittent traction may be applied, and the individual may be taught to use intermittent traction at home.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be given to relieve pain and decrease inflammation. Either oral or injected corticosteroids (“cortisone”) are commonly prescribed if there is severe radicular arm pain. If pain is severe, a narcotic may be added; in some cases, an antidepressant or an anticonvulsant may be used for its analgesic effect. If anxiety and tension are prominent, sedatives may be helpful. Muscle relaxants are frequently prescribed; however, their effectiveness probably is due to their sedative action. Narcotics, sedatives, and muscle relaxants are ideally used only for brief periods. Ongoing use should be weighed against the potential for addiction or abuse. Other treatments such as ice, heat, massage, and ultrasound therapy may help relieve pain.

As symptoms subside, activity is gradually increased and includes physical therapy to strengthen and mobilize the muscles of the neck and shoulder. An independent home exercise program is an essential component of any physical therapy. Good posture and frequent changes in position may help prevent fatigue and decrease pain. Preventive and maintenance measures, such as exercise, stress management, and proper body mechanics, should be continued indefinitely. If there is no improvement during the first 2 weeks, or if pain is still disabling after 6 weeks, further evaluation is necessary.

Most cases of cervical disc displacement with or without radiculopathy can be managed conservatively. However, surgery is indicated in cases where (1) pain management has failed, and the individual has intractable upper limb pain with imaging evidence of a correlating nerve root compression; (2) there is mechanical instability of the spine associated with disc herniation; (3) signs of neurological deficits are increasing (e.g., progressive or severe muscle weakness or severe arm pain with objective signs of nerve root compression on imaging); or (4) the disc herniation is massive and compresses the spinal cord, causing bowel and / or bladder control impairment, lower extremity weakness, sensory loss, or gait disturbance.

Surgery involves removal of the protruding nucleus pulposus (discectomy). The traditional method for removal of the disc is open discectomy under general anesthesia. The discectomy is most often done through an anterior approach (incision in the front of the neck), and is most often accompanied by a simultaneous fusion, frequently supplemented by use of a plate and screws. An alternative that is occasionally chosen is posterior (back of the neck incision) discectomy in which a portion of the vertebra that acts as a roof (lamina) over the spinal nerve is removed, creating a small window into the spine. The surgeon then removes the herniated disc material through this opening.

An alternative for younger patients who do not have facet arthritis or other significant aging change is anterior discectomy with simultaneous artificial disc replacement. This procedure appears to give early results as good as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, but long term results are not yet known or published (Gebremariam).

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



ACOEM

ACOEM's Practice Guidelines, the gold standard in effective medical treatment of occupational injuries and illnesses, are provided in this section to complement the disability duration guidelines.*
 
Neck and Upper Back Disorders
 
* The relationship between the MDGuidelines (MDA) content and ACOEM's guidelines is approximate and does not always link identical diagnoses. The user should consult the diagnostic codes in both guidelines, as well as the clinical descriptions, before assuming an equivalence.

Source: ACOEM Practice Guidelines



Prognosis

Most cervical disc herniations (an estimated 80% to 90%) improve with conservative treatment (Furman). With proper selection of surgical candidates, discectomy with rehabilitation has a good outcome in 80% to 90% of individuals (Furman).

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Rehabilitation

The primary focus of rehabilitation for a cervical intervertebral disc displacement without myelopathy is to decrease symptoms and increase function. Although exercise may be uncomfortable initially, individuals must be instructed in the benefits of ongoing exercise in managing the symptoms.

The first goal is to decrease symptoms, primarily pain. In combination with pharmacological management, modalities such as heat and cold can be used. Immobilization with a soft collar is rarely indicated; however with significant soft tissue pain, it might be necessary for a very short period of time (up to 3 days). While managing pain, individuals can be instructed in gentle exercises (Boyce). Due to the variability in response, the treating practitioner must pay careful attention to tolerance to treatment. Initial exercises may include isometrics, stretching and / or gentle range of motion. Spinal manual therapy may reduce symptoms when combined with active treatment. Postural training should be initiated as soon as tolerated by the individual.

Once symptoms subside and range of motion is restored, the individual should progress to strengthening and stabilization exercises of the neck, shoulders and upper trunk (Ylinen). Limited treatment with cervical traction has been shown to be beneficial for neck pain when done in conjunction with exercises, although traction must be carefully administered to avoid adverse response.

The individual should also be instructed in a home exercise program to complement the supervised rehabilitation, and trained to care for and protect the neck from recurrence of symptoms. An ergonomic evaluation can prove helpful in avoiding or modifying activities and work positions that may aggravate the symptoms. Psychotherapy may be indicated to support the individual and identify associated factors that may contribute to the symptoms. A short course of cognitive pain management may be beneficial for individuals experiencing psychological distress or lack of improvement with treatment (Klaber Moffett).

For further information about management of this condition and rehabilitation outcome please refer to Jenis et al.

FREQUENCY OF REHABILITATION VISITS
Nonsurgical
SpecialistDisplacement, Cervical Intervertebral Disc Without Myelopathy
Physical TherapistUp to 12 visits within 6 weeks
The table above represents a range of the usual acceptable number of visits for uncomplicated cases. It provides a framework based on the duration of tissue healing time and standard clinical practice.

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Complications

Worsening of the condition (enlargement or increasing size of the disc herniation) may cause pressure on the spinal cord as well as on additional nerve roots. Functional disturbances and / or pathological changes in the spinal cord (myelopathy) may occur as a result of the displaced disc pressing on the spinal cord. Muscular atrophy and sensory disorders may occur as the result of nerve root compression.

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Ability to Work (Return to Work Considerations)

In the acute phase, individuals with displaced cervical discs usually are advised to avoid overhead lifting or postures with the neck in extension (looking up), heavy lifting, or repetitive neck twisting motions (side to side), as these activities may increase symptoms. Certain other duties that require extension of the neck (e.g., painting ceilings, stocking overhead shelves) may be unsuitable for individuals with limited range of motion of the head and neck. Individuals may require regular time off for physical therapy. Use of prescription painkillers (analgesics) can affect dexterity and alertness. Their use may require review of drug policies.

Accommodations: Temporary or permanent transfer to a position with reduced lifting and carrying requirements, and with reduced need for extremes of neck posture will facilitate return to work.

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Maximum Medical Improvement

For cases managed with surgery and without complications, MMI is usually reached by 168 days after surgery.

Additional slow neurologic recovery may still occur, but because of time, not because of treatment (and therefore does not qualify as "MMI").

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



Failure to Recover

If an individual fails to recover within the expected maximum duration period, the reader may wish to consider the following questions to better understand the specifics of an individual's medical case.

Regarding diagnosis:

  • What is the diagnosis and what objective findings establish this diagnosis?
  • Is there sensory loss and / or weakness in the involved extremity?
  • On physical exam is pain aggravated by neck movement?
  • Is the range of motion of the neck restricted?
  • Is there tenderness over the affected vertebrae with palpation?
  • Have x-rays been done? If surgical fusion has been preformed, is the fusion solid? If disc replacement has been performed, is the artificial disc properly positioned? Is there evidence of a complication?
  • Has individual had a post-operative MRI or CT myelogram?
  • Has individual had an EMG?
  • Have conditions with similar symptoms been ruled out? Is a rheumatologic illness also present (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, etc.)
  • Is there a co-morbid low back disorder.
  • Is there use of a controlled substance for symptoms that precludes return to safety sensitive work?

Regarding treatment:

  • Would a change in medications perhaps improve pain and function?
  • Would home cervical traction be perhaps helpful? Was it tried during physical therapy?
  • If sleep is disturbed, would a “cervical pillow” be perhaps helpful?
  • Has the individual had an evaluation by a spine surgeon to discuss whether surgical treatment is an option?

Regarding prognosis:

  • Is the individual improving, static, or gradually worsening in terms of symptoms and function?
  • Is individual's employer able to accommodate any necessary restrictions?
  • Does individual have any additional conditions that may affect ability to recover?
  • Has individual developed myelopathy?
  • Are there psychosocial stressors or psychiatric co-morbidity that is not being addressed?

Source: Medical Disability Advisor



References

Cited

"Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (Slipped Disk)." MedlinePlus. 12 May. 2008. National Library of Medicine. 20 Sep. 2008 <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000442.htm>.

Boyce, R. H., and J. C. Wang. "Evaluation of Neck Pain, Radiculopathy, and Myelopathy: Imaging, Conservative Treatment, and Surgical Indications." Instructional Course Lectures 52 (2003): 489-495. National Center for Biotechnology Information. National Library of Medicine. 20 Sep. 2008 <PMID: 12690875>.

Furman, Michael B., and Kirk M. Puttlitz. "Cervical Disc Disease." eMedicine. Eds. Everett C. Hills, et al. 4 Dec. 2012. Medscape. 11 Mar. 2012 <http://emedicine.com/pmr/topic25.htm>.

Gebremariam, L. , et al. "Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness for the Herniated Cervical Disc: A Systematic Review." Spine 37 (2) (2012): E109-E118.

Hsu, W. K. , and . "Outcomes Following Nonoperative and Operative Treatment for Cervical Disc Herniations in National Football League Athletes." Spine 36 (10) (2011): 800-805.

Jenis, L. G. "Cervical Radiculopathy." The Adult and Pediatric Spine. Eds. J. W. Frymoyer and S. W. Wiesel. 3rd ed. 2 vols. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2004. 689-711.

Klaber Moffett, J. A., et al. "Randomised Trial of a Brief Physiotherapy Intervention Compared with Usual Physiotherapy for Neck Pain Patients: Outcomes and Patients' Preference." BMJ 330 7482 (2005): 75.

Schoenfeld, AJ, et al. "Incidence and Epidemiology of Cervical Radiculopathy in the United States Military." Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques 25 (2012): 17-22.

Ylinen, J. J., et al. "Decreased Strength and Mobility in Patients after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy Compared with Healthy Subjects." Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 84 7 (2003): 1043-1047. National Center for Biotechnology Information. National Library of Medicine. 20 Sep. 2008 <PMID: 12881832>.

General

Canale, S. Terry, and James H. Beaty, eds. "Cervical Disc Disease." Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2008. 2184-2195.

Source: Medical Disability Advisor






Feedback
Send us comments, suggestions, corrections, or anything you would like us to hear. If you are not logged in, you must include your email address, in order for us to respond. We cannot, unfortunately, respond to every comment. If you are seeking medical advice, please contact your physician. Thank you!
Send this comment to:
Sales Customer Support Content Development
 
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is published with the understanding that the author, editors, and publisher are not engaged in rendering medical, legal, accounting or other professional service. If medical, legal, or other expert assistance is required, the service of a competent professional should be sought. We are unable to respond to requests for advice. Any Sales inquiries should include an email address or other means of communication.